A very interesting article by Vivek Wadhwa posted recently on www.businessweek.com. The article examines popular political and public perceptions that the US is falling behind in educating and employing scientists. Wadhwa insists that the opposite is actually the case and provides a recent case study in the subject for proof. He cites sustained improvement in science education in terms of both quality and numbers. He also notes that the available jobs for recent graduates in science fields are actually fewer than those seeking positions. He points out that heeding calls for increases in numbers graduating with science or engineering backgrounds could result in many of those graduates taking positions in non-science related fields due to a shortage of jobs for them. His arguments make the case for improved science education initiatives that are also accompanied by job creation in these fields. Wadhwa’s closing arguments are supportive of a strong liberal arts background and continued investment into businesses which promote sustainability and provide innovative technical opportunities for college grads.
It is an interesting take with some definite room for debate on either side. Thoughts or opinions?